Case 3300678/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300678/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 8 February 2024 at Reading, before Employment Judge George, the tribunal heard Ms T Conceicao's claims against The Campbell Group Limited. The respondent did not attend, having been given notice of the hearing, and the claimant appeared in person with a Portuguese interpreter.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded £979.52. The judgment records that this amount was calculated gross and is to be paid after statutory deductions for tax and employee's national insurance contribution.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for holiday pay accrued but not paid on termination of employment and awarded £1,202.02. This amount was likewise calculated gross and is to be paid after statutory deductions for tax and employee's national insurance contributions. The total award was £2,181.54.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of unauthorised deduction from wages; the sum was calculated gross and is to be paid after statutory deductions for tax and employee's national insurance contribution. | Upheld | — | £980 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded in respect of holiday pay accrued but not paid on termination of employment; the sum was calculated gross and is to be paid after statutory deductions for tax and employee's national insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,202 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,182
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.