Case 3300683/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Great British Munch Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300683/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent admitted the claimant's complaints. Employment Judge Ord therefore entered judgment for the claimant in four sums: unpaid wages of £341.66 gross, unpaid holiday pay of £614.93 gross, a statutory redundancy payment of £1,537.34, and unpaid notice pay of £1,024.87 gross.
The judgment does not record any contested findings of fact or legal analysis beyond that admission. The total amount awarded was £3,518.80, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 12 June 2022.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted the complaint; the tribunal entered judgment for unpaid wages in this gross amount. | Upheld | — | £342 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent admitted the complaint; the tribunal entered judgment for unpaid holiday pay in this gross amount. | Upheld | — | £615 |
| Redundancy | The respondent admitted the complaint; the tribunal entered judgment for a statutory redundancy payment in this amount. | Upheld | — | £1,537 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent admitted the complaint; the tribunal entered judgment for unpaid notice pay in this gross amount. | Upheld | — | £1,025 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.