Case 3300684/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Spick v Great British Munch Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300684/2022
- Decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Spick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge Ord, recorded that the respondent had confirmed the claimant’s complaints were not resisted. On that basis, judgment was entered for Mrs C Spick against Great British Munch Ltd on 10 May 2022.
The tribunal awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,687.50, unpaid notice pay of £1,125.00 gross, and unpaid holiday pay of £1,078.24 net. The judgment does not set out any additional findings of fact or legal analysis beyond recording that the complaints were uncontested.
The total sum ordered was £3,890.74.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent confirmed that this complaint was not resisted. The tribunal entered judgment for a statutory redundancy payment of £1,687.50. | Upheld | — | £1,688 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent confirmed that this complaint was not resisted. The tribunal entered judgment for unpaid notice pay of £1,125.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,125 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent confirmed that this complaint was not resisted. The tribunal entered judgment for unpaid holiday pay of £1,078.24 net. | Upheld | — | £1,078 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,891
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.