Case 3300694/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Whitmore v Angel Kidz Nursery & Preschool Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300694/2025
- Decision date
- 6 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Whitmore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the working week of 2 to 6 December 2024 and ordered payment of £457.60 gross, calculated at 8 hours per day for 5 days at £11.44 per hour. Using the three months from September to November 2024 as the best available evidence of average earnings, the tribunal recorded the claimant's average salary as £368.98 gross or £354.66 net per week.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay £354.66 as damages, representing the estimated net remuneration for one week's notice. On holiday pay, the tribunal found that, having been employed for 212 days, the claimant was owed £1,200.15, calculated as 212/365 x 5.6 weeks x £368.98 average weekly salary.
The judgment is a short Rule 22 determination signed by Employment Judge Quill. It does not set out wider legal analysis or named legal tests, and no remedy components beyond the per-claim sums above are addressed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction for the period 2 December to 6 December 2024 (8 hours per day for 5 days at £11.44 per hour). | Upheld | — | £458 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages equal to estimated net remuneration for one week's notice. | Upheld | — | £355 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement calculated as 212/365 x 5.6 weeks x £368.98 average weekly salary. Judgment categorised on gov.uk under Working Time Regulations. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,012
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.