Case 3300704/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Smith v Maureen Brockton T/A Back to Backs Heard: By CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300704/2021
- Decision date
- 7 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim on 7 January 2022 by CVP before Employment Judge M Warren. It dismissed the claimant's claims that he was unfairly dismissed, that he was entitled to a redundancy payment, and that he should receive compensation for not having been provided with written terms and conditions of employment.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or within 14 days of the sending of the written record. The extracted decision therefore records the outcomes only, without a written explanation of the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to compensation for not having been provided with written terms and conditions of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.