Case 3300710/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Zengeya v Aspirations Care Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300710/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr A.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Zengeya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 1 February 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs R Zengeya an opportunity to make representations as to why her unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out. The tribunal said it appeared from the claim form that she had been employed by Aspirations Care Group Limited for less than two years, and that it appeared the tribunal could not consider the complaint that she had been unfairly dismissed.
Mrs Zengeya did not make representations explaining why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim. The judgment states, for the avoidance of doubt, that no other claims or complaints were struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the tribunal indicated the claim form suggested the claimant had less than two years' service and the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.