Case 3300711/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Sochon Mr J Parsley Mr P Stead Mr K Wright v The Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300711/2023
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Sochon Mr J Parsley Mr P Stead Mr K Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants brought complaints arising from a 2022 pay dispute. In this judgment the tribunal considered only the respondent's application to strike out the complaints under s. 146(1)(b) and s. 152(1)(b) TULR(C)A 1992, which relied on participation in industrial action and related picket-line activity as the trade union activities in issue.
The tribunal applied the Supreme Court's decision in Mercer and held that the claimants had no reasonable prospects of successfully arguing that the alleged detriments were protected by s. 146(1)(b), because taking part in industrial action fell outside that protection. The tribunal also held that s. 152(1)(b) had to be interpreted consistently with s. 146, so the automatic unfair dismissal complaint under that provision also had no reasonable prospects of success.
The s. 146(1)(b) and s. 152(1)(b) complaints were struck out. The judgment expressly recorded that the claimants' other complaints were not struck out and would proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under s. 146(1)(b) TULR(C)A 1992 for detriment on grounds related to trade union activities was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint under s. 152(1)(b) TULR(C)A 1992 was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. Other complaints were not struck out and were left to proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- no reasonable prospects of success
- s. 146(1)(b) TULR(C)A 1992
- s. 152(1)(b) TULR(C)A 1992
- Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer [2024] UKSC 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.