Case 3300724/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v AK Security Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300724/2021
- Decision date
- 4 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloom Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Abduljabar Hussein claimed wages due for the period 30 September 2020 to 15 October 2020. He said he worked 192 hours for AK Security Services Limited and received no wages. He gave evidence that the arrangement was payment of £100 for every 12 hours worked.
Employment Judge Bloom accepted that evidence and was satisfied that the sum claimed was due. The tribunal calculated 192 hours at the agreed rate and found £1,600.00 was owed. The judgment therefore ordered the respondent to pay £1,600, subject to lawful deductions for Income Tax and National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was for wages due for the period 30 September 2020 to 15 October 2020. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he worked 192 hours at £100 for every 12 hours, giving a sum due of £1,600, subject to lawful deductions for Income Tax and National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.