Case 3300724/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Adamski & Others (see attached schedule) v The Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300724/2023
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Adamski & Others (see attached schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 6 January 2025 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying causes of action.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.