Case 3300728/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nailard and 10 others v Global Baggage Solutions Limited (in voluntary liquidation Arrangement) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300728/2021
- Decision date
- 24 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nailard and 10 others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns claims by Mr J Nailard and 10 others against Global Baggage Solutions Limited (in voluntary liquidation Arrangement). On 8 September 2021, the Tribunal wrote to the claimants giving them an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the response should not be struck out because the case had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not follow, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto ordered that the claims be struck out.
The judgment is a short procedural decision and does not record a substantive hearing, liability findings on the underlying claims, or any monetary remedy. It is signed and dated 24 November 2021, with the judgment sent to the parties on 14 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that 'the claims are struck out' after the claimants failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter of 8 September 2021, and did not request a hearing. The extracted text does not specify the individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.