Case 3300759/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Baxter v Carben Construction Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300759/2021
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Baxter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr J Baxter’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeded against Carben Construction Limited. The hearing was at Norwich on 9 December 2021 before Employment Judge M Warren, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr M Bennett.
The written decision gives the outcome and remedy only. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £3,130.25, made up of a basic award of £2,087.25 and a compensatory award of £1,043.
The judgment also states that the recoupment provisions apply. It records a grand total of £3,130.25, a prescribed element of £1,787, a prescribed period from 7 January 2021 to 7 August 2021, and an excess over the prescribed element of £1,342.75. The note at the end says reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,130
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,087
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,043
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.