Case 3300764/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr D Mabert (Director) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300764/2022
- Decision date
- 11 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dobbie
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dobbie, sitting alone at Cambridge by video, recorded that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and/or breach of contract succeeded. The respondent conceded liability, and the tribunal upheld the claim in the sum of £1,040.00 gross.
The written record does not set out separate findings on different heads of claim or any contested factual issues. It records only the conceded liability and the gross amount awarded.
The judgment note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No separate remedy components were identified beyond the single gross award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment described the claim as for unpaid wages and/or breach of contract. The respondent conceded liability for the gross sum awarded, and the judgment did not separate the amount between different heads. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,040
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.