Case 3300779/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Francis Neckles – Trade Union Representative For the v Ms A Mosley – Ford – In house paralegal — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300779/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Francis Neckles – Trade Union Representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing at Watford by CVP on 8 June 2022 before Employment Judge A M Buchanan. The claimant was Ms Julia Roberts and the respondent was Arriva London North Limited t/a Arriva London. The claimant was represented by Mr Francis Neckles, Trade Union Representative, and the respondent by Ms A Mosley-Ford, in-house paralegal.
The tribunal recorded that the complaints of race discrimination, however advanced under the Equality Act 2010, were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It also recorded that the complaint of detriment on the grounds of health and safety under sections 44 and 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No deposit order was made because the respondent had not applied for one under Rule 39 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. Case management orders were issued separately. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination complaints under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the public preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Other | The detriment complaint on the grounds of health and safety under sections 44 and 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 39 of Schedule I to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- sections 44 and 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.