Case 3300782/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Sener v Heyman AI — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300782/2021
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Sener
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment, made after the respondent's time limit for presenting a response had expired and no response had been filed. On the available material, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto determined that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,461.54.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded damages of £4,411.83 on that claim. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, with an award of £2,884.62. The total gross sum payable was recorded as £10,757.99.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,462 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for that claim. | Upheld | — | £4,412 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,758
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.