Case 3300791/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Saida Shah v A&A Enterprises London Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300791/2022
- Decision date
- 8 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Saida Shah
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short disposal judgment. It records that the hearing took place remotely at Watford Hearing Centre on 17 February 2023 before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondents represented.
The judgment states that proceedings against the second respondent, Budgens Head Office, and the third respondent, Shell UK Retail, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the text supplied, and no remedy is recorded.
The judgment text supplied does not state the outcome of any claim against the first respondent, A & A Enterprises London Limited, and it contains no other findings relevant to liability or compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Proceedings against the second respondent, Budgens Head Office, and the third respondent, Shell UK Retail, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment records no substantive liability findings or monetary award. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.