Case 3300828/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Ashok Ahir v F. Hinds Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300828/2024
- Decision date
- 4 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Salter Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Ashok Ahir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a decision on a procedural application rather than a merits judgment. At Watford Employment Tribunal on 4 November 2024, before Employment Judge M. Salter, the claimant applied to amend the Particulars of Claim.
The tribunal allowed only limited amendments to paragraphs 21, 22 and 31 so that the named individuals were correctly identified. The balance of the application to amend was refused.
The written record does not contain any substantive findings on liability, discrimination, dismissal, or remedy, and it records no award of compensation or other monetary relief.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Interlocutory application to amend the Particulars of Claim. The tribunal allowed only amendments to paragraphs 21, 22 and 31 to correctly identify the named individuals, and refused the remainder of the amendment application. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.