Case 3300849/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Michelle O’Brien v Solenvis Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300849/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Michelle O’Brien
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Michelle O’Brien brought a claim against Solenvis Limited for unpaid holiday pay, described in the judgment as a claim for unlawful deductions from wages. Employment Judge Millard heard the case by CVP video in Reading on 14 November 2022. The Respondent was represented by Ian Thompson and Justin Oldham, both directors.
The tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s claim. The written judgment records only the outcome and does not set out separate reasons in the text supplied. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No monetary award was made. The judgment records no separate remedy assessment and no additional findings beyond dismissal of the unpaid holiday pay claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.