Case 3300870/2025 · Employment Tribunal
D G Gebrehawryat & others v ALLPLANTS Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300870/2025
- Decision date
- 4 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
D G Gebrehawryat & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimants were employed at the same establishment at Solar House, 282 Chase Road, London N14 6NZ and were made redundant on or after 22 November 2024. It found that there was no recognised trade union or elected employee representatives at the establishment, and that 20 or more employees at that establishment were made redundant or placed at risk of redundancy on or within 90 days of 22 November 2024.
The tribunal held that the claimants were dismissed during this period without any consultation having taken place, and that the last dismissal occurred by 31 December 2024 so that the claims were presented within the time limit in section 189(5)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The first respondent, which was in administration, did not file a response, although its administrators consented to the protective award claim proceeding; the second respondent also did not file a response.
On remedy, the tribunal said there was no reason to depart from the principle that protective awards are punitive and should be made for the maximum period unless there are circumstances making it just not to do so. It therefore made a protective award for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 22 November 2024, and noted that the Recoupment Regulations apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal found a failure to consult and made a protective award for the protected period beginning on 22 November 2024 and lasting 90 days. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(5)(b) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- protective awards are punitive and should be for the maximum period unless there are circumstances making it just not to do so
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.