Case 3300892/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Rawlings v Blossom HCG Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300892/2022
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
- Venue
- at Watford via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Rawlings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short case-management judgment before Employment Judge Codd at Watford via CVP on 17 March 2023. The tribunal granted the respondent permission to rely on its ET3 and grounds of resistance out of time.
The tribunal also made a preparation time order against the respondent in the claimant's favour for the hearing on 17 March 2023 and associated preparation. The record states that the value of any such award would be assessed at a future hearing.
No substantive merits findings or final liability decision are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Permission granted for the respondent to rely on its ET3 and grounds of resistance out of time. This was a procedural application, not a substantive merits determination. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | A preparation time order was made against the respondent in the claimant's favour in respect of the hearing on 17 March 2023 and associated preparation. The amount was left to be assessed at a future hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.