Case 3300909/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Fallows v Axell Wireless (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300909/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Fallows
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response to the claim. On the information before Employment Judge Hawksworth, the tribunal found that Mr M Fallows had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,456.
The tribunal also found that Mr Fallows was unfairly dismissed. The judgment does not set out a remedy for that claim; instead, it states that the remedy to which he is entitled will be decided at a hearing.
A claim for a protective award was not finally determined in this judgment. The tribunal recorded that it would be decided at a hearing, and notice of that hearing would be sent separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,456. | Upheld | — | £6,456 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but the remedy was left to be decided at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,456
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.