Case 3300924/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend (nor did her Father Mr P Giblett representing her) For the v Mr Williams, Director — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300924/2025
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend (nor did her Father Mr P Giblett representing her) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Norwich on 5 August 2025, before Employment Judge Postle, the claimant did not attend and neither did her father, Mr P Giblett, who was listed as representing her. The respondent was represented by Mr Williams, Director. The written judgment records that the respondent conceded 80 hours of minimum wage at £7.55 per hour.
On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant in the sum of £604, described in the judgment as unpaid wages due to the claimant. The decision does not record any separate remedy beyond that wage award, and no further findings or awards are set out in the published text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent conceded 80 hours of minimum wage at £7.55 per hour, and the tribunal awarded £604 as unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £604 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £604
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.