Case 3301004/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D A Choudhury v Home Office v — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301004/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Panel members
- Mrs D Ballard, Mrs F Betts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D A Choudhury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found that Mrs D A Choudhury's application for flexible working was not an application made under section 80F of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, her complaint under section 80H failed and was dismissed.
The decision was given orally at the hearing on 11 November 2022, with written reasons not provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision. The tribunal sat at Reading by CVP before Employment Judge Hawksworth with Mrs D Ballard and Mrs F Betts.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible working | The tribunal found that the claimant's application for flexible working was not an application made under section 80F of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the complaint under section 80H failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 80F Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.