Case 3301060/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kevin Aldridge v Dnata Catering UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301060/2021
- Decision date
- 2 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kevin Aldridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Watford on 2 March 2022 before Employment Judge Bedeau. It dismissed the claimant’s claims for redundancy pay, unauthorised deductions from wages, and accrued unpaid holiday, stating in each instance that the claim was not well-founded.
The tribunal also allowed the respondent’s contract claim. It found that claim well-founded and ordered Mr Aldridge to pay dnata Catering UK Ltd £2,609.57. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal stated that the claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated that the claim of accrued unpaid holiday was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the respondent’s contract claim was well-founded and orders the claimant to pay £2,609.57. | Upheld | — | £2,610 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,610
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.