Case 3301084/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Bejaj and Mr Haxiu (in person) For the v Mr Scuplak (Human Resources Adviser) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301084/2021
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
- Venue
- Watford Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Bejaj and Mr Haxiu (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the First Claimant, Mr S Haxiu, succeeded in his unfair dismissal claim, but reduced the claim by 60% for contributory fault. The tribunal likewise held that the Second Claimant, Mr A Bejaj, succeeded in his unfair dismissal claim, with a 75% reduction for contributory fault. The judgment refers to reasons given in the oral judgment delivered at the hearing, but those reasons are not set out in the extracted text provided here.
No remedy figure is recorded in this judgment. The tribunal directed that a remedies hearing be listed for 2 October 2023, so the financial consequences were to be determined separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded subject to 60% contributory fault; remedies hearing listed for 2 October 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded subject to 75% contributory fault; remedies hearing listed for 2 October 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.