Case 3301115/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Morley, Consultant — 2019
- Case reference
- 3301115/2021
- Decision date
- 3 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented a breach of contract claim arising from work done through the respondent as an agency worker at Asda. The tribunal found that, if 3 May 2019 was taken as the end of employment, the ordinary limitation date was 2 August 2019, but the claim was not presented until 11 February 2021. The claim was therefore about 79 to 80 weeks out of time and could only proceed if the tribunal were satisfied under article 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994 that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that any later presentation was within a reasonable further period.
The claimant said that he had been unaware of ACAS, employment tribunals, and his rights until a later dismissal by another employer in July 2020, and he also relied on homelessness and eviction issues during part of the later delay. The tribunal accepted that he had genuinely been ignorant of his rights before July 2020, but held that this ignorance was not reasonable in light of his years of work history, multiple workplaces, repeated dismissals, access to the internet and other sources of advice, and the fact that employment tribunals were part of the working environment. It also found that the homelessness and eviction difficulties did not explain the earlier delay because they arose much later than the end of employment.
The tribunal therefore concluded that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within time, and also that the period between the expiry of the time limit and presentation of the claim was not a reasonable further period. The claim was struck out. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was presented as a breach of contract complaint under the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994. The tribunal held it was presented about 79-80 weeks out of time and refused an extension, so the claim was struck out. The claimant's proposed amendment to add automatic unfair dismissal was not determined at this hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Article 7, Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994
- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable further period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.