Case 3301117/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Mr J Fournel (Director). — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301117/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 9 and 10 December 2021 before Employment Judge KJ Palmer. The claimant, Miss E Wright, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr J Fournel, director of Astrid Fournel (Fournel Southwold) Ltd.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims in unfair dismissal and under section 103A failed and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to the claim as one 'under s.103A', which is the protected-disclosure automatic unfair dismissal provision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.