Case 3301199/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Fuller v Oregon Scientific (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301199/2021
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Fuller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because Oregon Scientific (UK) Limited did not present a response to the claim. The only claim recorded in the judgment was unauthorised deduction from wages.
Mrs H Fuller was found to be owed unpaid wages for November 2020, December 2020 and January 2021. The tribunal awarded £8,631.00 in compensation, described as three months' pay at £2,877 per month.
The judgment records that the award is a gross figure and that the judgment would be satisfied if the Respondent made a net payment to the Claimant and accounted to HMRC for any tax or national insurance due on the payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the Respondent did not present a response. The award was for unpaid wages for November 2020, December 2020 and January 2021, described as three months' pay at £2,877 per month. The judgment states the figure is gross and may be satisfied by a net payment with HMRC accounting for any tax or national insurance due. | Upheld | — | £8,631 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,631
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £8,631
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.