Case 3301204/2025 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the Third Claimant: Ms S Clement, Second Claimant For the v Secretary of State for Business & Trade — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301204/2025
- Decision date
- 2 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the Third Claimant: Ms S Clement, Second Claimant For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the respondent's name of its own initiative to Secretary of State for Business & Trade.
The claimants' claims were dismissed. The Tribunal recorded that, having regard to s.184(2)(d) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, remuneration under a protective award counts in calculating arrears of pay, and that the respondent had already paid each claimant eight weeks' pay from the National Insurance Fund in compliance with s.182 and s.184(1) of the Act.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment dismisses the claims because the respondent had already paid each claimant eight weeks' pay from the National Insurance Fund in respect of arrears of pay; no monetary figures are stated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.184(2)(d) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.182 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.184(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.