Case 3301231/2022 · Employment Tribunal
no attendance, having been given notice of the hearing For the v Ms K Dwan, HR Manager DISMISSAL — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301231/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
no attendance, having been given notice of the hearing For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 12 September 2022 before Employment Judge George. The claimant, Mrs M Zawadzka, did not attend. The judgment records that notice of the hearing had been sent to the email address she had provided as her contact address on 8 May 2022.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had also been ordered to provide a schedule of loss and witness statement by an order sent to the parties on 30 June 2022, but had apparently not complied with any tribunal orders. She had also not replied to a request for information dated 24 February 2022. The claim form did not include a telephone number, so it was not practicable for the tribunal to make further enquiries about the reason for her absence.
After considering those matters and the representations made by Ms Dwan for the respondent, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment states simply that all claims were dismissed and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed. The GOV.UK listing category for the case is unlawful deduction from wages, which is the only claim type identified in the materials provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the ET Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.