Case 3301248/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Winters, Paralegal For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301248/2021
- Decision date
- 8 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr O Winters, Paralegal For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary issue hearing in Cambridge by CVP on 4 March 2022, Employment Judge Tynan, sitting alone, determined that Ms J Blanche was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that this applied at the relevant times in December 2018 and between June and October 2020, by reason of the combined effects of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Chronic Immune Thrombocytic Purpura (ITP).
The decision was confined to that preliminary issue. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment text supplied, and the written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times, namely in December 2018 and between June and October 2020, by reason of the combined conditions of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Chronic Immune Thrombocytic Purpura (ITP). | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.