Case 3301249/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Kintu v Busy Bees Nurseries Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301249/2024
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Kintu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Kintu brought a claim against Busy Bees Nurseries Limited. The case was heard at Reading by CVP on 6 January 2025 before Employment Judge Anstis. The claimant did not attend and was not represented; the respondent was represented by Mr B Frew, counsel.
The written record states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed. It also records that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons are provided unless a request was made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent.
The decision was sent to the parties on 21 January 2025. The record does not include the tribunal's factual findings or any separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment record does not set out the substantive reasons or identify the claim in the body of the text; the GOV.UK case listing identifies the matter as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.