Case 3301303/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Duffy, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301303/2021
- Decision date
- 25 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Duffy, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant’s claims for unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and holiday pay. It dismissed the redundancy pay claim as not well-founded. The written record also notes that the respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment, and that an award under s38 Employment Act 2002 formed part of the overall compensation figure.
By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £15,000 as compensation for all upheld claims. The judgment records that this sum was to be paid in three instalments of £5,000, due 14 days from the date of judgment, 9 June 2022, and 9 July 2022. The written record does not set out the oral reasons given at the hearing, and it does not break down the £15,000 between the individual upheld claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Included in the global £15,000 compensation order; no claim-specific apportionment stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included in the global £15,000 compensation order; no claim-specific apportionment stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Included in the global £15,000 compensation order; no claim-specific apportionment stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.