Case 3301307/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ciosek v DHL Aviation UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301307/2021
- Decision date
- 23 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Ciosek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims. It also dismissed the claim for unpaid holiday pay and the claims for suspension pay and company sick pay.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that he was not entitled to a redundancy payment. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment grouped the claims for suspension pay and company sick pay and dismissed them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy and so was not entitled to a redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.