Case 3301320/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ashley Southall v Celerity Ls Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301320/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ashley Southall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The reasons record that the claimant, Ashley Southall, failed to attend a hearing on 16 December 2021.
By orders sent to the parties on 11 January 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the stated grounds, including that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. In those circumstances, the tribunal struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text. The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 16 December 2021 and then failed to make written representations or request a further hearing when given the opportunity by orders sent on 11 January 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.