Case 3301324/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301324/2021
- Decision date
- 22 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issues judgment heard at Norwich on 22 July 2022 before Employment Judge S Moore. The Claimant, Mr P Sinclair, appeared in person and the Respondent, Traditional Norfolk Poultry Limited, was represented by counsel. No substantive liability findings were made in this judgment.
The tribunal dismissed the Respondent's application to strike out the claim, or any part of it, on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. It also dismissed the Respondent's application for a deposit order on the ground that the claim, or part of it, had little prospect of success.
The tribunal further dismissed the Claimant's application to strike out the response, or any part of it, on the grounds that it was scandalous or vexatious or that the Respondent had failed to comply with the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. No monetary remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application to strike out the claim, or any part of it, on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's application for a deposit order as a condition of continuing to advance the claim, on the ground that it had little prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claimant's application to strike out the response, or any part of it, on the grounds that it was scandalous or vexatious or that the Respondent had failed to comply with the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- little prospect of success
- scandalous or vexatious
- failure to comply with the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.