Case 3301351/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Dogan v Heyman AI — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301351/2021
- Decision date
- 6 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Dogan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr E Dogan against Heyman AI Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £3,500. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,500 for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,250. The judgment records Employment Judge Anstis and does not set out any separate award breakdown beyond the three sums ordered, which total £10,250.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,500 |
| Breach of contract | Breach found in respect of notice only. | Upheld | — | £3,500 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £3,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.