Case 3301395/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Head v Rowledge Pre-School Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301395/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Head
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 July 2022, the tribunal gave Mrs T Head an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the tribunal order dated 18 June 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Anstis therefore struck out the claim on 9 February 2023. The judgment was sent to the parties on 23 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the case as a whole and does not discuss this head separately; the claim types here follow the listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment strikes out the case as a whole and does not discuss this head separately; the claim types here follow the listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the case as a whole and does not discuss this head separately; the claim types here follow the listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the case as a whole and does not discuss this head separately; the claim types here follow the listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the case as a whole and does not discuss this head separately; the claim types here follow the listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.