Case 3301411/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hunn v D.S. Pub Management Ltd, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301411/2025
- Decision date
- 2 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Hunn
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim brought by Mr K Hunn against D.S. Pub Management Ltd and Darren Clark. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued: by a letter dated 17 September 2025, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, but no sufficient written representations were made and no hearing was requested.
The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of any substantive complaint and does not identify a remedy award. It records only the procedural disposal of the case by strike out, approved by Employment Judge Warren Date on 11 November 2025 and sent to the parties on 2 December 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter dated 17 September 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.