Case 3301442/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Rana-Magar v Nisa’s Hair and Beauty Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301442/2021
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Rana-Magar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment dated 12 May 2021 in which Employment Judge Anstis found that Nisa’s Hair and Beauty Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs M Rana-Magar’s wages. The judgment records the claimant and respondent names and the case number, but does not set out further factual findings or reasoning in the extracted text.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint and ordered the respondent to pay £7,721.28 to the claimant. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the extracted judgment, and no other claims, legal tests, or findings are identified in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £7,721.28. | Upheld | — | £7,721 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,721
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.