Case 3301462/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Polinac, Counsel For the v Ms A Jervis, Consultant — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301462/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Polinac, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a costs judgment issued after a Case Management Preliminary Hearing on 7 September 2022 at Cambridge before Employment Judge Tynan sitting alone. The tribunal ordered the Respondents, Swaney Construction Ltd and Mr N Swaney, to pay the Claimant's costs of that hearing.
The costs were assessed by the tribunal at £1,140 and were ordered to be paid to the Claimant no later than 21 September 2022. The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying employment claims, only the costs order.
The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision. The written record was sent to the parties on 14 September 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This document is a costs judgment only. It orders the Respondents to pay the Claimant's costs of the Case Management Preliminary Hearing, assessed at £1,140. No substantive liability findings on the underlying tribunal claims are set out in the extracted text. | Other | — | £1,140 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,140
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.