Case 3301481/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bexley v Bennetts Car Parts — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301481/2025
- Decision date
- 18 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bexley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. By letter dated 24 June 2025, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success, the stated reason being that the claimant had less than two years' continuous service with the respondent.
The claimant did not make representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. No remedy was awarded and no findings on the substantive merits of dismissal were made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 24 June 2025 to make representations or request a hearing on strike-out because the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success due to less than two years' continuous service. No representations were made and no hearing was requested, so the complaint was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.