Case 3301483/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Dakin v Computer Salvage Specialists (SW) Ltd t/a CSS Recycling — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301483/2021
- Decision date
- 29 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Dakin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 25 September 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations as to why the claim should not be treated as concluded because the employment tribunal did not have the power to make an award for inconvenience suffered by the claimant. The Tribunal also considered that the claim appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, in response. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment was sent to the parties on 29 October 2021, following the Employment Judge's decision dated 21 October 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the text. It records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because the Tribunal did not have power to make an award for inconvenience suffered by the claimant and the claim appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.