Case 3301501/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Pote v Gem Environment Building Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301501/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Pote
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 15 November 2021 Employment Judge R Lewis made a Rule 21 judgment in Mr R Pote's claim against Gem Environment Building Services Limited. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had not presented a response, and accordingly the response was struck out and the respondent was debarred from defending the claim.
This judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims or any monetary award. It states that the hearing remained listed on 8 December 2021, so the substantive issues were still to be dealt with separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment striking out the respondent's response and debarring it from defending the claim; the judgment does not record a substantive determination of the breach of contract claim or any remedy. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment striking out the respondent's response and debarring it from defending the claim; the judgment does not record a substantive determination of the unlawful deduction from wages claim or any remedy. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.