Case 3301535/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Cunningham v Laura Ella Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301535/2023
- Decision date
- 29 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge R Lewis determined that a decision could properly be made on the material before the tribunal without a hearing on the merits.
The judgment records that Miss N Cunningham was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal therefore upheld the breach of contract claim and ordered Laura Ella Ltd to pay damages of £600.00 gross.
No other claim outcome or separate remedy calculation is set out in the judgment text provided. The judgment does not split the award between heads of loss, and it records no interest or additional sums.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment under rule 21 states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £600.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.