Case 3301541/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sajel Patel v Create Pure Beauty Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301541/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sajel Patel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions for salary, and holiday pay. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have 2 years' service and the complaint did not have reasonable prospects of success. The unlawful deductions for salary complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. The holiday pay complaint was well founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant 997.20 gross for 69.8 hours at 14.00 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have 2 years' service and the complaint did not have reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint for unlawful deductions for salary was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £997 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £997
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.