Case 3301566/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Danny Arnold v Star Transport and Warehousing Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301566/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr.
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- M A Buck, M A Chinn-Shaw
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Danny Arnold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed the complaint of direct disability discrimination, finding that claim not well-founded. It upheld the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. The written record does not set out the full factual reasoning because the tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in this judgment record.
The remedy was assessed at a total of £11,611.94. That sum comprised £1,390.90 for financial losses, £9,000.00 for injury to feelings, and £1,221.04 interest on the injury to feelings award under the Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996. The judgment does not split the award further between the discrimination complaints.
The judgment also records that all other complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. Those complaints are not individually identified in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination was found not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability succeeded. The written record does not set out detailed reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Upheld | Disability | £11,612 |
| Other | All other complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; the judgment does not list them individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,612
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,391
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.