Case 3301576/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301576/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms AM Telfer, Ms B Von Maydell-Koch
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 24 to 31 March 2023 before Employment Judge Bedeau, sitting with lay members Ms AM Telfer and Ms B Von Maydell-Koch. The claimant, Mr Jean Mendes, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms P Leonard, Counsel.
In the final judgment dated 31 March 2023, the tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The tribunal also found that the direct sex discrimination claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the direct sex discrimination claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.