Case 3301586/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ali v Preact Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301586/2020
- Decision date
- 4 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mr P Hough, Mrs F Betts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hybrid hearing at Reading on 8, 9 and 10 August 2022 before Employment Judge Eeley, with lay members Mr P Hough and Mrs F Betts, Mr D Ali pursued claims against Preact Ltd alleging age, sex and religion discrimination under sections 13 and 26 of the Equality Act 2010.
The written judgment records that all three discrimination claims failed and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested; the extracted decision contains no further findings explaining the dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.