Case 3301613/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Knapp v A W Champion — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301613/2024
- Decision date
- 4 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Knapp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 June 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr L Knapp an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint of disability discrimination and 'body shaming, bullying and promotion restriction' should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and/or that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
Mr Knapp responded on 4 July 2024 accepting the Tribunal's analysis and saying he was content for those claims to be struck out. The judgment therefore records that the disability discrimination complaint was struck out.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim for arrears of pay remained live. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to the complaint of disability discrimination and 'body shaming, bullying and promotion restriction' together and orders that complaint to be struck out. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- no jurisdiction to hear the claim
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.