Case 3301618/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Rothwell v Omnia Outsourcing Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301618/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Rothwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South East Employment Tribunals on 3 February 2023. The respondent, Omnia Outsourcing Limited, failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge George Date determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £384.60 gross. It also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,038.47.
No other remedies were recorded in the judgment. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £1,423.07.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Holiday pay | Determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £1,038 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,423
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.